People in the industry understand that Xiaomi TV and LeTV are dead, but also domestic smart TV sales are among the best, especially for new users who like to compare them, especially the new millet TV 3 and LeTV 3 Today, Xiao Bian shares some information and I hope it will help everyone.
Judging from the sales figures of the two companies in 2014, TV sales of the two companies are not at all on an order of magnitude. In 2014, cumulative sales of Xiaomi TV were about 300,000 units, while LeTV sold more than 1.5 million units. This kind of data difference shows that the two companies are not at the same level of magnitude. Such a touch of porcelain is too obvious.
According to the data, 8 upstream lines of 8.5 generations of production lines such as Samsung, LGD, BOE, and China Star Optoelectronics have been put into production in China. In 2015, China will become the country with the largest capacity of 8.5-generation line LCD panels, which means 55 Inches will become the mainstream size of the TV industry in 2015. It is precisely because of this LeTV in 2015 to promote 55-inch products, after all, music as a user-centric company, has always been tailored to the needs of the market for users. At present, only Sharp has 10th-generation lines in the country, and LG's own 8.5-generation line to produce more than 60-inch products may have high cost and low yield.
If Xiaomi and LeTV really want to compare products, then Xiaobian will conduct a real contest based on the current high-end of the two main pushes. Next, Xiaobian will take Xiaomi TV 3 (60′′ flagship) and LeTV 3 X55 (top flagship). Machine), the two sides compare high-end models in 2015, to restore the truth to everyone. This time, it mainly focuses on the five aspects of consumer concern: television technology, accessories, UI system, hardware, and price.
Technology LeTV victory over the millet still need to accumulate
The first is to compare the product technology of both parties. Both Millet TV 3 and LeTV 3 X55 adopt the all-metal process, but there is a big difference in the details of the products. The millet TV 3 The metal is used for every splicing technology, while the Ultra 3 X55 uses a metal seamless bending forming technology.
If you compare the two, the metal seamless bending integrated technology used in the Ultra 3X55 is slightly better. The seamless bending technology makes the border of the TV more beautiful and safer, preventing the cleaning of the TV, or inadvertently Bumps. The spliced ​​metal frame adopted by the millet TV 3 generally has sharp sharp corners, which is very easy to cause harm to the user, and it is dangerous if there is a child at home.
In addition, LeTV has done a very good job in humanizing the details. There are dust plugs in the body to prevent dust from entering the TV. I believe that when it comes to comparing the two, it is better for consumers to have their own numbers.
Rejected plastic music metal remote control feel good
The comparison between TV products is also the competition of two product accessories. The same is true for millet TV remote control and LeTV Super Remote 3. The comparison between the materials of the two products is based on the plastic remote control of millet. Metal-based music as a super-remote control 3 light on the feel of the difference. (From November on, LeTV Super TV comes standard with Super Remote 3)
Xiao Bian as a user to pursue the touch, when personally started to use millet remote control and Super 3 remote control will find that the metal material of the music as super remote control 3 will give people a good feel, as if the touch on the smooth mirror, and touch When you control the millet's remote control, it feels less smooth and has a jerky feel.
In addition, at present, the metal process is the most difficult in the process of the product, and in particular, the one-piece product needs to overcome many problems, and the metal process at the cost has to pay more. The most important thing is that the somatosensory remote control of Xiaomi TV 3 is not a standard, and it needs the user to purchase it separately. Otherwise, LeTV Super Remote Control 3 is a collective product and does not require the user to generate secondary consumption. This product matching difference tells the truth. It's a bit big and consumers understand it.
Rejected mediocre music as the new feature of the EUI system
Mentioned that many people in the MIUI system is not unfamiliar, with the outstanding influence of Xiaomi mobile phone, MIUI has now become an intelligent system that is deeply loved by 100 million users. But attentive users will find that it hasn't changed much since its introduction. In the current version, Xiaomi TV 3 only adds voice capabilities. In addition there is no other characteristic at all. On the contrary, the EUI system provided by LeTV is composed of five desktops: smart applications, video recommendations, carousel desktops, search desktops, and video sources. Based on LeTV's powerful video library, the network LIVE desktop and the entire network video search desktop The convenient and fast source desktop live broadcast locks all the highlights for you. In addition, LeEui EUI also supports rich multi-screen interaction, voice input/control, cloud services and other functions, which can be fully enjoyed in all LeTVs.
If we compare the feature features of the Xiaomi TV 3 and the LeTV 3 X55 system, it seems that we can only find new voice features in Xiaomi TV, and there are no bright spots in other areas. In contrast, the EUI system of the LeTV 3 X55 has numerous features, such as far-speaking voice 2.0 function, gesture/skeletal somatosensory technology, top USB3.0 interface, live desktop, 4K own content resources, etc. This is what Xiaomi cannot match.
Music as hardware configuration highlights the human rice millet
From the millet TV 3 and music as ultra 3 X55 hardware competition, the gap between the two is not obvious, both are using the MStar 6A918 processor clock processor, 4 core CPU + 4 core GPU and 2GB + 8GB of memory , Only the difference in the size of the screen, but both sides use LGD 4K 2D screen, with 60Hz refresh rate, in order to ensure the viewing of dynamic images without distortion is not trailing, but more than 3 millet TV 6M60 image processing core. There are obvious differences in the performance of the color gamut. Xiaomi TV 3 has 85% color gamut and LeSheng 3 X55 has 72% color gamut. This is actually very difficult for consumers to choose. They like colorful users. High-saturation TVs will be selected, but some users currently report that TVs with high color saturation are often not realistic enough in the screens presented by the screen, and there are dazzling situations in which visual fatigue occurs. In the end, the users believe that users have their own judgments.
In terms of interface configuration, the LeTV 3 X55 has more USB 3.0 ports, SD card slots, and optical audio output ports than the Xiaomi TV 3, and the user-prepared interface is sufficient to achieve the best scalability of LeTV Super TVs. The top USB3.0 interface can be used to connect a somatosensory camera, a super gun king, and can decode video and audio files. In addition, the extra SD card slot can expand the physical memory of the Super TV, and the additional fiber interfaces can output lossless audio source code, allowing the TV to become a home theater (required with a movie theater set).
The price is obviously different from the two-way comparison advantage
In the end, Xiao Bian and everyone compare the price of these two products. First of all, the price of Xiaomi TV 3 is 4,999 yuan, while the price of LeTV 3 X55 is 3,699 yuan, both from the price of bare metal. There is a gap of 1,300 yuan. If only from the price of the product to consider, I believe that for the working-class consumers will certainly choose a cost-effective, good performance products, the screen is not so big, then 5 will not play a decisive factor in the purchase, Instead, cost-effectiveness is the key point in the purchase process.
Millet has all along been claiming to create a home theater exclusively for young people. The launch of Xiaomi TV 3 is no exception. Through official data, it can be seen that Xiaomi's package price for the entire home theater is 5,598 yuan, which includes 4999 yuan TV soundbar + 599 yuan subwoofer. The LeTV Super Cinema set price is 4698 yuan which includes 3699 yuan TV +999 yuan soundbar + subwoofer and so on. Judging from the package price of the theater, it is still LeTV 3X55 has obvious advantages, the overall price added to be cheaper than the millet TV 3 900 yuan, this cost-effective believe that no consumer will not move.
Millet TV 3 and music as Super 3 X55 contrast summary
From the comparison of Xiaomi TV 3 and LeTV 3 X55, from the competition of TV technology, accessories, UI system, hardware, and price, Xiaobian can feel the superiority of LeTV 3 X55. Winning in each competition.
Summary one: In the process, the technology of metal seamless folding bending is higher than that of Xiaomi TV 3, especially in the humanized design. LeTV Super TV makes the border of the TV beautiful and adds security. . On the contrary, these humanized details are not noticed by Xiaomi TV.
Summary 2: In the accessories, LeTV Super Remote Control 3 is equipped with somatosensory functions compatible with most of the somatosensory games in Super TVs, and Millet TV 3 needs to purchase accessories for playing somatosensory games. This is extremely inhuman. In addition, if there is a need to buy accessories, then LeTV as a user has not prepared a somatosensory camera, super gun king and other exclusive accessories product controllable users to buy and use.
Summary 3: In terms of system, Xiaomi TV 3 has no special highlight function in addition to the new voice function, but instead, the LeTV 3 X55 has many functions, such as far-speaking voice function, gesture/skeletal somatosensory technology, etc. The addition of new features can add extra material to the user's daily life.
Summary IV: In the hardware competition, the two can be quite close, the key hardware parameters are all the same, but in the interface, the millet TV 3's equipment will be slightly inferior, such as USB interface, SD card slot, optical audio output interface these millet There are no TV 3s. These are the places where Xiaomi will need to learn in the TV industry and LeTV.
Summary 5: The selling price can be the most critical factor in the purchase of television by consumers. Whether it is the price of bare metal or the price of a home theater package, the LeTV 3 X55 must be nearly a thousand dollars less than a millet TV ( Bare metal cheaper price 1,300 yuan, home theater package cheaper 900 yuan), such a high cost-effective products that no consumer will not be moved.
Xiao Bian reminds everyone here that the third-party application market can make up for the lack of TV box resources. For example, the sofa butler (http://) is the best choice, with the full application, fast update, and good experience as its purpose. Smart TV users can download experience. HDP, show control, Dragon live, vst all polymerization, TV cat, Youku, iQiyi, etc. can be downloaded in the sofa butler.
Judging from the sales figures of the two companies in 2014, TV sales of the two companies are not at all on an order of magnitude. In 2014, cumulative sales of Xiaomi TV were about 300,000 units, while LeTV sold more than 1.5 million units. This kind of data difference shows that the two companies are not at the same level of magnitude. Such a touch of porcelain is too obvious.
According to the data, 8 upstream lines of 8.5 generations of production lines such as Samsung, LGD, BOE, and China Star Optoelectronics have been put into production in China. In 2015, China will become the country with the largest capacity of 8.5-generation line LCD panels, which means 55 Inches will become the mainstream size of the TV industry in 2015. It is precisely because of this LeTV in 2015 to promote 55-inch products, after all, music as a user-centric company, has always been tailored to the needs of the market for users. At present, only Sharp has 10th-generation lines in the country, and LG's own 8.5-generation line to produce more than 60-inch products may have high cost and low yield.
If Xiaomi and LeTV really want to compare products, then Xiaobian will conduct a real contest based on the current high-end of the two main pushes. Next, Xiaobian will take Xiaomi TV 3 (60′′ flagship) and LeTV 3 X55 (top flagship). Machine), the two sides compare high-end models in 2015, to restore the truth to everyone. This time, it mainly focuses on the five aspects of consumer concern: television technology, accessories, UI system, hardware, and price.
Technology LeTV victory over the millet still need to accumulate
The first is to compare the product technology of both parties. Both Millet TV 3 and LeTV 3 X55 adopt the all-metal process, but there is a big difference in the details of the products. The millet TV 3 The metal is used for every splicing technology, while the Ultra 3 X55 uses a metal seamless bending forming technology.
If you compare the two, the metal seamless bending integrated technology used in the Ultra 3X55 is slightly better. The seamless bending technology makes the border of the TV more beautiful and safer, preventing the cleaning of the TV, or inadvertently Bumps. The spliced ​​metal frame adopted by the millet TV 3 generally has sharp sharp corners, which is very easy to cause harm to the user, and it is dangerous if there is a child at home.
In addition, LeTV has done a very good job in humanizing the details. There are dust plugs in the body to prevent dust from entering the TV. I believe that when it comes to comparing the two, it is better for consumers to have their own numbers.
Rejected plastic music metal remote control feel good
The comparison between TV products is also the competition of two product accessories. The same is true for millet TV remote control and LeTV Super Remote 3. The comparison between the materials of the two products is based on the plastic remote control of millet. Metal-based music as a super-remote control 3 light on the feel of the difference. (From November on, LeTV Super TV comes standard with Super Remote 3)
Xiao Bian as a user to pursue the touch, when personally started to use millet remote control and Super 3 remote control will find that the metal material of the music as super remote control 3 will give people a good feel, as if the touch on the smooth mirror, and touch When you control the millet's remote control, it feels less smooth and has a jerky feel.
In addition, at present, the metal process is the most difficult in the process of the product, and in particular, the one-piece product needs to overcome many problems, and the metal process at the cost has to pay more. The most important thing is that the somatosensory remote control of Xiaomi TV 3 is not a standard, and it needs the user to purchase it separately. Otherwise, LeTV Super Remote Control 3 is a collective product and does not require the user to generate secondary consumption. This product matching difference tells the truth. It's a bit big and consumers understand it.
Rejected mediocre music as the new feature of the EUI system
Mentioned that many people in the MIUI system is not unfamiliar, with the outstanding influence of Xiaomi mobile phone, MIUI has now become an intelligent system that is deeply loved by 100 million users. But attentive users will find that it hasn't changed much since its introduction. In the current version, Xiaomi TV 3 only adds voice capabilities. In addition there is no other characteristic at all. On the contrary, the EUI system provided by LeTV is composed of five desktops: smart applications, video recommendations, carousel desktops, search desktops, and video sources. Based on LeTV's powerful video library, the network LIVE desktop and the entire network video search desktop The convenient and fast source desktop live broadcast locks all the highlights for you. In addition, LeEui EUI also supports rich multi-screen interaction, voice input/control, cloud services and other functions, which can be fully enjoyed in all LeTVs.
If we compare the feature features of the Xiaomi TV 3 and the LeTV 3 X55 system, it seems that we can only find new voice features in Xiaomi TV, and there are no bright spots in other areas. In contrast, the EUI system of the LeTV 3 X55 has numerous features, such as far-speaking voice 2.0 function, gesture/skeletal somatosensory technology, top USB3.0 interface, live desktop, 4K own content resources, etc. This is what Xiaomi cannot match.
Music as hardware configuration highlights the human rice millet
From the millet TV 3 and music as ultra 3 X55 hardware competition, the gap between the two is not obvious, both are using the MStar 6A918 processor clock processor, 4 core CPU + 4 core GPU and 2GB + 8GB of memory , Only the difference in the size of the screen, but both sides use LGD 4K 2D screen, with 60Hz refresh rate, in order to ensure the viewing of dynamic images without distortion is not trailing, but more than 3 millet TV 6M60 image processing core. There are obvious differences in the performance of the color gamut. Xiaomi TV 3 has 85% color gamut and LeSheng 3 X55 has 72% color gamut. This is actually very difficult for consumers to choose. They like colorful users. High-saturation TVs will be selected, but some users currently report that TVs with high color saturation are often not realistic enough in the screens presented by the screen, and there are dazzling situations in which visual fatigue occurs. In the end, the users believe that users have their own judgments.
In terms of interface configuration, the LeTV 3 X55 has more USB 3.0 ports, SD card slots, and optical audio output ports than the Xiaomi TV 3, and the user-prepared interface is sufficient to achieve the best scalability of LeTV Super TVs. The top USB3.0 interface can be used to connect a somatosensory camera, a super gun king, and can decode video and audio files. In addition, the extra SD card slot can expand the physical memory of the Super TV, and the additional fiber interfaces can output lossless audio source code, allowing the TV to become a home theater (required with a movie theater set).
The price is obviously different from the two-way comparison advantage
In the end, Xiao Bian and everyone compare the price of these two products. First of all, the price of Xiaomi TV 3 is 4,999 yuan, while the price of LeTV 3 X55 is 3,699 yuan, both from the price of bare metal. There is a gap of 1,300 yuan. If only from the price of the product to consider, I believe that for the working-class consumers will certainly choose a cost-effective, good performance products, the screen is not so big, then 5 will not play a decisive factor in the purchase, Instead, cost-effectiveness is the key point in the purchase process.
Millet has all along been claiming to create a home theater exclusively for young people. The launch of Xiaomi TV 3 is no exception. Through official data, it can be seen that Xiaomi's package price for the entire home theater is 5,598 yuan, which includes 4999 yuan TV soundbar + 599 yuan subwoofer. The LeTV Super Cinema set price is 4698 yuan which includes 3699 yuan TV +999 yuan soundbar + subwoofer and so on. Judging from the package price of the theater, it is still LeTV 3X55 has obvious advantages, the overall price added to be cheaper than the millet TV 3 900 yuan, this cost-effective believe that no consumer will not move.
Millet TV 3 and music as Super 3 X55 contrast summary
From the comparison of Xiaomi TV 3 and LeTV 3 X55, from the competition of TV technology, accessories, UI system, hardware, and price, Xiaobian can feel the superiority of LeTV 3 X55. Winning in each competition.
Summary one: In the process, the technology of metal seamless folding bending is higher than that of Xiaomi TV 3, especially in the humanized design. LeTV Super TV makes the border of the TV beautiful and adds security. . On the contrary, these humanized details are not noticed by Xiaomi TV.
Summary 2: In the accessories, LeTV Super Remote Control 3 is equipped with somatosensory functions compatible with most of the somatosensory games in Super TVs, and Millet TV 3 needs to purchase accessories for playing somatosensory games. This is extremely inhuman. In addition, if there is a need to buy accessories, then LeTV as a user has not prepared a somatosensory camera, super gun king and other exclusive accessories product controllable users to buy and use.
Summary 3: In terms of system, Xiaomi TV 3 has no special highlight function in addition to the new voice function, but instead, the LeTV 3 X55 has many functions, such as far-speaking voice function, gesture/skeletal somatosensory technology, etc. The addition of new features can add extra material to the user's daily life.
Summary IV: In the hardware competition, the two can be quite close, the key hardware parameters are all the same, but in the interface, the millet TV 3's equipment will be slightly inferior, such as USB interface, SD card slot, optical audio output interface these millet There are no TV 3s. These are the places where Xiaomi will need to learn in the TV industry and LeTV.
Summary 5: The selling price can be the most critical factor in the purchase of television by consumers. Whether it is the price of bare metal or the price of a home theater package, the LeTV 3 X55 must be nearly a thousand dollars less than a millet TV ( Bare metal cheaper price 1,300 yuan, home theater package cheaper 900 yuan), such a high cost-effective products that no consumer will not be moved.
Xiao Bian reminds everyone here that the third-party application market can make up for the lack of TV box resources. For example, the sofa butler (http://) is the best choice, with the full application, fast update, and good experience as its purpose. Smart TV users can download experience. HDP, show control, Dragon live, vst all polymerization, TV cat, Youku, iQiyi, etc. can be downloaded in the sofa butler.