Research on the problem of color tolerance of LED illumination

Since Newton discovered that white light is composed of a spectrum of colors, modern color science has been evolving for over three centuries. Starting with Thomas Young's three primary colors in 1802, progressing through Ewald Hering’s opponent color theory in 1878, and later advancing to the stage-specific color theories of GE Muller (1930) and Judd (1949), we have progressively developed ways to explain the physiological, psychological, and physical aspects of human color perception. In terms of quantitative analysis and chromaticity calculations, the development of color measurement systems has also undergone significant changes. From the CIE-1931-RGB chromaticity standard, we have moved to CIE-1931-XYZ, CIE-1960-UCS, CIE-1964-W*U*V*, CIE-1976-LAB, CIE-1976-LUV, and the CIE-DE2000 standards, among others. Despite the comprehensive nature of colorimetric theory and its widespread application in industries such as television, printing, materials, cosmetics, medicine, and food, the Chinese LED lighting manufacturing sector has lagged in fully utilizing this knowledge. Apart from basic color metrics like coordinates, color temperature, color rendering, and DUV, chromatic aberration or color tolerance indicators are seldom discussed. Human evaluation of color differences tends to be highly subjective, relying heavily on visual assessment rather than precise numerical measurements. This approach, combined with the desire to avoid additional costs associated with tighter tolerances, has led to a lax attitude toward managing color differences in LED lighting. Consequently, significant variations in light color exist not only between products from different manufacturers but also between batches from the same producer. If color tolerance issues are not addressed effectively, achieving high-quality LED lighting becomes nearly impossible. The concept of SDCM (Standard Deviation of Color Matching), originally proposed by David L. MacAdam of Kodak in 1942, addresses this issue by defining the permissible range of color variation where a color difference remains imperceptible to the human eye. MacAdam conducted experiments using 25 target colors from the CIE-1931-XYZ chromaticity diagram, adjusting filters to create matching colors visually indistinguishable from these targets. These experiments revealed that the resulting matching points formed ellipses around the target colors, with varying sizes, directions, and lengths for each ellipse. These ellipses became known as MacAdam ellipses. Taking into account factors such as equipment error, observer variability, and subjective judgment, it was challenging to precisely define the boundaries of these ellipses. Thus, statistical concepts like standard deviation were employed to establish boundaries representing areas with no visible color difference. Using mathematical interpolation techniques, parameters for MacAdam ellipses could be estimated across the entire chromaticity diagram. While newer chromaticity systems like CIE-1976-LUV and CIE-DE2000 offer detailed descriptions of chromatic aberration, they typically focus on calculations involving brightness, hue, and saturation—methods better suited for assessing larger color differences. For smaller variations, particularly between different light sources or lamps, MacAdam’s color tolerance method proves more appropriate. Industry standards such as GBT 10682-2010, IEC-60081-2010, and ANSI C78-376-2001 utilize the SDCM index to specify acceptable color tolerances for fluorescent lights. These standards set limits on color temperature deviations, DUV ranges, and McAdam ellipse parameters. While fluorescent lighting adheres to these guidelines, LED lighting lacks similar standardized criteria. Adopting the SDCM index for evaluating LED color differences simplifies communication and comprehension. By focusing on a central point and measuring distances to surrounding points, understanding becomes more straightforward than interpreting abstract metrics like color coordinates or DUV values. Such clarity empowers end-users to become active participants in ensuring quality control throughout the LED lighting supply chain. International LED chip manufacturers generally comply with ANSI C78-377 specifications, categorizing chips into multiple bins based on proximity to the ANSI center point. However, due to factors such as junction temperature fluctuations, optical system changes, and current variations, finished LED products often exhibit greater color shifts than anticipated. For instance, consider a luminaire utilizing NICHIA NF2L757ART chips. Initially positioned near the ANSI center point, post-production adjustments result in significant drifts towards the edges of the specified tolerance zones. Addressing these challenges requires innovative solutions. Techniques include color blending (mixing different colored chips), adjusting phosphor ratios during production, and preheating chips before sorting to simulate operational conditions. Each method presents unique advantages and limitations, requiring careful consideration based on specific manufacturing contexts. Ultimately, addressing color consistency in LED lighting demands collaboration among chip producers, lighting designers, and end-users. Establishing clear industry standards, enhancing testing capabilities, and fostering consumer awareness are essential steps toward improving product reliability and advancing the global LED market.

Optical Transmitter

1310nm Optical Transmitter,Directional Modulation Optical Transmitter,1550nm Internally Modulated Optical Transmitter,1550nm optical transmitter

Shenzhen Runtop Technology Co.LTD , https://www.runtoptech.com

This entry was posted in on